Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5791.1281287684@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands
patch
Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > updated patch attached What exactly is the point of the \sf command? It seems like quite a lot of added code for a feature that nobody has requested, and whose definition is about as ad-hoc as could be. Personally I'd much sooner use \ef for looking at a function definition. I think if \sf had been submitted as a separate patch, rather than being snuck in with a feature people do want, it wouldn't be accepted. The current patch doesn't even compile warning-free :-( command.c: In function `exec_command': command.c:559: warning: `lineno' might be used uninitialized in this function command.c: In function `editFile': command.c:1729: warning: `editor_lineno_switch' might be used uninitialized in this function regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: