Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 578D593A.3000002@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/18/2016 03:17 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 7/17/16 2:22 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > I do agree that DDL "feels better" (which I think is what JD was > alluding too). Yes and no. It reads better and is more clear to those who are not developers or have a developer background which is, many in the database field. It is also easier to type. I type 120 a minute on a roll, that is until I have to do this ('[ ..... Simple wording base command structure is much more efficient. ALTER TABLE FOO ENABLE REPLICATION ON SLAVE 0; vs select enable_replication_for_table('['foo']',0); Guess which one was typed without a single error and more quickly. Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: