Re: Postgres vs. Redhat DB
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres vs. Redhat DB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5785.1010556866@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres vs. Redhat DB ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Hunter, Ray wrote: >> 3. What is the difference between PostgreSQL and RedHat's version? > Redhat's version runs on (and I believe has optimizations for?) Linux ... > PgSQL runs on pretty much everything ... Red Hat's version is not presently materially different from the community PostgreSQL version. In the future, the latest RH release might be ahead of, behind, or different from the latest community release at any given instant, due to vagaries of release cycles, customer feature requests, or what have you. But there is no intention on either side (I fervently hope and believe) to cause a code fork or long-term divergence. Red Hat will provide commercial-grade support for PostgreSQL running on RH Linux, and not for PG on any other system (AFAIK anyway). But what you're buying if you buy RHDB is that support, not a fundamentally different product. regards, tom lane Red Hat Database project
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: