Re: Memory usage per session
От | Achilleas Mantzios |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory usage per session |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 577FBB32.5030306@matrix.gatewaynet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory usage per session (AMatveev@bitec.ru) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 08/07/2016 17:07, AMatveev@bitec.ru wrote: > Hi > >>>>> The test performs about 11K lines of code >>>>> Oracle: about 5M >>>>> postgreSql: about 160М > >> Do you have 100 CPUs on this system which apparently doesn't have 16G >> of RAM available for PG to use? > We can say at fact: > We currently work at oracle. > Our code base about 4000 k line of code > In out last project we have: > 3000 current connection > 200 active session > So 16g it's very optimistic. > Of course we think about buy hardware or software. > It's other question. > So with this memory consumption it can be really cheaper to by Oracle. >> If not, you should probably consider connection pooling to reduce the >> number of PG sessions to something approaching the number of CPUs/cores >> you have in the system. > It's possible only with application server, No, you can deploy PgPool or PgBouncer. Apart from that, I just checked in my system. User sessions have size of 16M. Not 160M. > for local network thick client has reasonable advantages. > We just can't implement today all functions on thin client. > > > -- Achilleas Mantzios IT DEV Lead IT DEPT Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: