Re: [pgsql-patches] pg_dump pretty_print
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-patches] pg_dump pretty_print |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 57777b8d126d1f02471da7f0cdfa8a82@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-patches] pg_dump pretty_print
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Peter Eisentraut replied: > The harm here is that under undefined circumstances a dump file > will not be a proper and robust representation of the original > database, which would add significant confusion and potential for error. What "undefined circumstances" are we talking here? If there is a chance that pg_get_viewdef and company do not output a version that can be read again by the database because we simply changed the whitespace, that sounds like a serious bug to be fixed, not a reason to reject this optional flag. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200701251003 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFuXd2vJuQZxSWSsgRA9VDAJ9S1b+4DJomO3Bmij4wvida9wtgfgCeID16 qeoNrrehtTGIeJeL8T+mx9M= =VecV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: