Re: "vacuum" and "cluster"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jimmy Choi
Тема Re: "vacuum" and "cluster"
Дата
Msg-id 5770602b0804161221u1bda561cr71349626d268742d@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: "vacuum" and "cluster"  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: "vacuum" and "cluster"
Список pgsql-general
Presumably, even if CLUSTER does reindexing internally, it only does
that for the index used for clustering. Since REINDEX includes all
indices, CLUSTER cannot truly replace REINDEX. Correct?

Jimmy

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Craig Ringer escribió:
>
>
>  > It's not stated explicitly, but I'm pretty sure discussion here has
>  > mentioned that too. Given that, VACUUM FULL on a just-CLUSTERed table
>  > should be redundant.
>
>  It is, and a REINDEX is redundant too because CLUSTER does it
>  internally.
>
>  --
>  Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
>  PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Sam Mason
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Storage sizes for dates/times (documentation bug?)
Следующее
От: "David Wilson"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: table as log (multiple writers and readers)