Re: Vacuum full: alternatives?
От | Andreas Kretschmer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum full: alternatives? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5767B963.5090800@a-kretschmer.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vacuum full: alternatives? (Job <Job@colliniconsulting.it>) |
Ответы |
R: Vacuum full: alternatives?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Am 20.06.2016 um 11:18 schrieb Job: > Hello, > > we have a table with an heavy traffic of pg_bulkload and delete of records. > The size pass, in only one day, for example for 1Gb to 4Gb and then 1Gb back. > > We have important problems on size and the only way to gain free space is issueing a vacuum full <table>. > But the operation is very slow, sometimes 2/4 hours, and table is not available for services as it is locked. > > We do not delete everything at one (in this case the truncate woudl resolve the problem). > > The autovacuum is not able (same for normal vacuum) to free the spaces. > autovaccum marks space as free, but don't give the space back to os. I would suggest run only autovacuum, and with time you will see a not more growing table. There is no need for vacuum full. Andreas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: