Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 574F030F.7030108@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/06/16 17:27, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 5/31/16 8:48 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>>> Robert Haas wrote: >>>>> I just want to point out that if we change #1, we're breaking >>>>> postgresql.conf compatibility for, IMHO, not a whole lot of benefit. >>>>> I'd just leave it alone. >>> >>>> We can add the old name as a synonym in guc.c to maintain >>>> compatibility. >>> >>> I doubt this is much of an issue at this point; max_worker_processes has >>> only been there a release or so, and surely there are very few people >>> explicitly setting it, given its limited use-case up to now. It will be >>> really hard to change it after 9.6, but I think we could still get away >>> with that today. >> >> max_worker_processes was added in 9.4, so it's been there for two >> releases, but it probably is true that few people have set it. >> Nevertheless, I don't think there's much evidence that it is a bad >> enough name that we really must change it. > > ISTM that all the confusion about parallel query would go away if the > setting was max_parallel_assistants instead of _workers. It's exactly > how parallel query works: there are helpers that *assist* the backend in > executing the query. > > The big downside to "assistants" is it breaks all lexical connection to > max_worker_processes. So what if we change that to > max_assistant_processes? I think "assistant" and "worker" are close > enough in meaning for "stand alone" uses of BG workers so as not to be > confusing, and I don't see any options for parallelism that are any > clearer. That GUC also controls worker processes that are started by extensions, not just ones that parallel query starts. This is btw one thing I don't like at all about how the current limits work, the parallel query will fight for workers with extensions because they share the same limit. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: