On 05/18/2016 09:57 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
> There is no clear consensus why some major versions should be more
> major than others, and breaking compatibility is off the table as reason
> it seems.
Well, the problem with the "breakage" approach is that then we just
argue about "how much breakage is enough to justify a major-major"? It
changes the content of the annual argument, without making it go away.
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)