Re: Reviewing freeze map code
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 573B806B.8020301@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Reviewing freeze map code (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Reviewing freeze map code
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/17/2016 12:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Syntaxes are; > VACUUM (SCAN_ALL) table_name; > VACUUM (SCAN_ALL); -- for all tables on database > > Is SCAN_ALL really the best we can do here? The business of having an > underscore in an option name has no precedent (other than > CURRENT_DATABASE and the like). How about COMPLETE, TOTAL, or WHOLE? > VACUUM (ANALYZE, VERBOSE, WHOLE) .... That seems reasonable? I agree that SCAN_ALL doesn't fit. I am not trying to pull a left turn but is there a technical reason we don't just make FULL do this? JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: