Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5739.1168551162@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes: > Given that this could result in data loss, if this was to be done I'd > very much want to see a way to disable it in a production environment. Production environments are the same ones that won't be happy with random checkpoint failures, either. If we can't find a way to positively identify the deleted-file failures then I think we've got to do something like this. (You know, of course, that my opinion is that no sane person would run a production database on Windows in the first place. So the data-loss risk to me seems less of a problem than the unexpected-failures problem. It's not like there aren't a ton of other data-loss scenarios in that OS that we can't do anything about...) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: