Re: 10.0
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 10.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 57364C11.4040004@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 10.0 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 10.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/13/2016 05:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > An analogy that might get some traction among database geeks is that > version numbers are a sort of surrogate key, and assigning meaning to > surrogate keys is a bad idea. > > :-) I agree year-based numbers will cause us grief. I don't have any strong opinions about this. It's essentially a marketing decision, and I'm happy to leave that to others. If and when we do change, I'd like to put in a modest request that we add an extra _ to the branch names, like this: REL_10_0_STABLE. That would mean they would sort nicely, which would make my life simpler in a few places in the buildfarm code. If not, I'd like a little advance notice so I can check all the places where we compare branch names. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: