Re: 10.0
От | Josh berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 10.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 573641D2.5000204@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 10.0 (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 10.0
Re: 10.0 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/13/2016 02:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I still don't like that much, and just thought of another reason why: > it would foreclose doing two major releases per year. We have debated > that sort of schedule in the past. While I don't see any reason to > think we'd try to do it in the near future, it would be sad if we > foreclosed the possibility by a poor choice of versioning scheme. Well, we have done two major releases in a year before, mostly due to one release being late and the succeeding one being on time. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: