Re: When should be advocate external projects?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: When should be advocate external projects? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5734F263.5030204@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: When should be advocate external projects? (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: When should be advocate external projects?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/12/2016 02:02 PM, Justin Clift wrote: > On 12 May 2016, at 21:58, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote: >>> On 12 May 2016, at 21:24, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >>>> I think our wiki page that lists all the FDWs is great, so why can't we >>>> do this for other external software? >>>> >>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers >>> >>> That page does seem well put together. Guess the main question now is >>> "who will drive this initiative?" IMO: A much better solution is to rework the software catalogue to properly highly open source "projects" versus "products" and allow people to manage via a moderated interface their own listings. It will be consistent, provide a central place within the primary domain and be lower overhead than a wiki. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: