Re: When should be advocate external projects?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: When should be advocate external projects? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5734C759.1040008@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: When should be advocate external projects? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: When should be advocate external projects?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/12/2016 07:09 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > There may be some cases where it's not clear whether something > qualifies, so, yeah, we might need some guidelines for that. But I'm > +1 on the concept. I am -1 on promoting pglogical over every other Agreed except under this definition: No other open source tool provides the solution. Right now for logical replication that uses the logical decoding API that PostgreSQL provides there is exactly "1" solution and that is PgLogical. That doesn't mean their aren't other Logical Replication solutions (Slony for example) but nobody in their right mind can say that Slony is the better choice for "standard master/slave" replication. And FTR: I am not saying Slony is a bad tool, it isn't but the services it provides are far beyond what the average person would be looking for if they were considering something like PgLogical. Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: