Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

On 2016-05-09 6:30 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>wrote:
>     As such, assuming this proposal is adopted, I firmly support 10.0 for the
>     next major.
>
> ​Two things...
>
> Are we inclined to change this once we release Beta 1?
>
> Does the person in charge of tagging the repo, i.e. Tom Lane, watch -advocacy?

I would expect the version number to be mutable through the beta phase, and only
be locked down once the first release candidate is out. -- Darren Duncan