Re: Reviewing freeze map code
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 572D068F.3050608@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reviewing freeze map code (Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reviewing freeze map code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/06/2016 02:01 PM, Josh berkus wrote: > On 05/06/2016 01:58 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2016-05-06 13:54:09 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> On 05/06/2016 01:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > >>>> There already is FREEZE - meaning something different - so I doubt it. >>> >>> Yeah I thought about that, it is the word "FORCE" that bothers me. When you >>> use FORCE there is an assumption that no matter what, it plows through >>> (think rm -f). So if we don't use FROZEN, that's cool but FORCE doesn't work >>> either. >> >> SCANALL? >> > > VACUUM THEWHOLEDAMNTHING > I know that would never fly but damn if that wouldn't be an awesome keyword for VACUUM. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: