Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0

On 04/29/2016 11:50 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 04/29/2016 11:36 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>>     Egos.
>>
>>     Consider PgLogical, who is working on this outside of 2Q?
>>
>>
>> Thank you for volunteering to assist. What would you like to work on?
>
> You are very welcome. I have been testing as you know. I would be happy
> to continue that and also was going to look into having a subscriber
> validate if it is connecting to a subscribed node or not which is the
> error I ran into.
>
> I am also interested in creating user docs (versus reference docs).

So what do you think Simon? How about we put pgLogical under community 
infrastructure, use the postgresql redmine to track bugs, feature 
requests and documentation?

I guarantee resources from CMD and I bet we could get others to 
participate as well. Let's turn this into an awesome community driven 
extension.

Sincerely,

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.