Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 57180207.5090900@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2 ("drum.lucas@gmail.com" <drum.lucas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 04/20/2016 02:51 PM, drum.lucas@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Well.. will try ONE more time then. > > > 1 - The customer can add any value into users.code column > 2 - The customer can chose between *add or no**t* add the value on > users.code column > 3 - If users.code is null (because the customer's chosen not to add any > value in there), a trigger/function has to do the job. > 4 - the function/trigger add the next available value, which the default > is 1000 and it's stored on companies.client_code_increment In addition to what John and David said, from your original post: "DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS client_code_increment_count(); CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "public"."client_code_increment_count" () RETURNS TABLE("code" INT) AS $BODY$ SELECT MAX(CAST(users.code AS INT)) FROM users WHERE users.code ~ '^\d+$' AND company_id = 2 $BODY$ LANGUAGE sql; SELECT * FROM "client_code_increment_count"();" If I am following, this duplicates the information in companies.client_code_increment, in that they both return the last non-user code. Of course this assumes, as David mentioned, that the client is not using a numeric code system. Then you are left trying to figure whether a number is 'your' number or 'their' number? > > Lucas > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: