Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 570BE57C.8080607@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/11/2016 10:46 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Doesn't match my experience at all. The vast majority of my customers > refer to it by version number. > > Also, considering Ubuntu is by far the largest used Linux distro, I > am not sure how much of that is happening in practice. > > > Also very different from my experience. Outside things like docker > (which most people don't run postgres on - yet?), redhat/centos is > significantly bigger with my customers. I should clarify: When dealing with bare metal -- by far our customer base is RedHat/CentOS. When dealing with anything cloud, it is by far Debian or Ubuntu. > > Just as a point of input - clearly our customers fall in fairly > significantly different groups,and we need to be able to deal with both. > Absolutely. > > I should note that I am not suggesting we forgo version names but > adding something that is fun could be useful... Something to think > about. > > > > FWIW, I believe redhat also has such "code names". Except really > *nobody* use them there... True. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: