Re: Make query ID more portable
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Make query ID more portable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 570860.1634046047@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Make query ID more portable (Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Make query ID more portable
Re: Make query ID more portable |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > But core jumbling code is good, fast and much easier in support. It won't be fast once you stick a bunch of catalog lookups into it. I think this is fine as an extension, but it has no chance of being accepted in core, just on performance grounds. (I'm also not sure that the query ID calculation code is always/only invoked in contexts where it's safe to do catalog accesses.) A bigger issue is that query ID stability isn't something we are going to promise on a large scale --- for example, what if a new release adds some new fields to struct Query? So I'm not sure that "query IDs should survive dump/reload" is a useful goal to consider. It's certainly not something that could be reached by anything even remotely like the existing code. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: