Re: [HACKERS] v10beta pg_catalog diagrams
От | Neil Anderson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] v10beta pg_catalog diagrams |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56ff4bf5-0402-a5d0-6acf-668a45b2b11e@postgrescompare.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] v10beta pg_catalog diagrams (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] v10beta pg_catalog diagrams
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-06-13 1:22 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:07:35PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 6/12/17 11:28, Neil Anderson wrote: >>> I'm cross posting from general. I did some work to diagram the >>> relationships in pg_catalog for v10. I would like to add it to the >>> developer FAQ here >>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#Is_there_a_diagram_of_the_system_catalogs_available.3F >>> but I thought I should check if people thought it appropriate and useful >>> before I do? >>> >>> https://www.postgrescompare.com/2017/06/11/pg_catalog_constraints.html >> >> Go for it. > > Yeah, great. We have been talking about adding diagrams to our > official docs but needed an updated toolchain, which I think we now > have, so there is a lot of opportunity for growth here. > Wonderful. I've added it. There were a few relationships that I couldn't capture. Like where in pg_extension extconfig is an array of oids that refer to pg_class or where pg_depends could refer to basically any other system catalog, but it's mostly there and has all 62 tables from pg_catalog. -- Neil Anderson neil@postgrescompare.com http://www.postgrescompare.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: