Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56e64628-940b-dca9-1388-872a914f8ea0@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 14.02.22 10:16, Amit Kapila wrote: > I think exposing LSN is a better approach as it doesn't have the > dangers of wraparound. And, I think users can use it with the existing > function pg_replication_origin_advance() which will save us from > adding additional code for this feature. We can explain/expand in docs > how users can use the error information from view/error_logs and use > the existing function to skip conflicting transactions. We might want > to even expose error_origin to make it a bit easier for users but not > sure. I feel the need for the new syntax (and then added code > complexity due to that) isn't warranted if we expose error_LSN and let > users use it with the existing functions. Well, the whole point of this feature is to provide a higher-level interface instead of pg_replication_origin_advance(). Replication origins are currently not something the users have to deal with directly. We already document that you can use pg_replication_origin_advance() to skip erroring transactions. But that seems unsatisfactory. It'd be like using pg_surgery to fix unique constraint violations.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: