Re: unexpected result from to_tsvector

On 3/25/16 12:14 PM, Artur Zakirov wrote:
> On 25.03.2016 18:19, David Steele wrote:
>> Hi Artur,
>>
>> On 3/20/16 10:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de> writes:
>>>> On Mar 20, 2016 01:09, "Dmitrii Golub" <dmitrii.golub@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Alex, actually subdomain can start with digit,
>>>
>>>> Not according to the RFC you have linked to.
>>>
>>> The powers-that-be relaxed that some time ago; I assume there's a newer
>>> RFC.  For instance, "163.com" is a real domain:
>>
>> You marked this patch "needs review" and then a few minutes later
>> changed it to "waiting on author".
>>
>> If this was a mistake please change it back to "needs review".  If you
>> really are working on a new patch when can we expect that?
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> Hi,
>
> The previous patch is current, which can be commited.
>
> I mark this patch as "needs review", because I noticed that the patch
> was marked as "waiting on author". And I thought that I forgot to mark
> as "need review".
>
> But then I noticed that Robert Haas marked the patch as "waiting on
> author" after my answer, and I returned "waiting on author". But I cant
> find any questions or comments to me after my last answer.
>
> Actually I think that this patch should be marked as "need review".

Done.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net