Re: Partitioning and ORM tools
От | CS DBA |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioning and ORM tools |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56F1B721.5040504@consistentstate.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partitioning and ORM tools (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partitioning and ORM tools
Re: Partitioning and ORM tools Re: Partitioning and ORM tools |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 03/22/2016 03:18 PM, Rob Sargent wrote: > > > On 03/22/2016 03:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> On 03/22/2016 01:50 PM, CS DBA wrote: >> >>> Understood, was just wondering if there is a way to cause the child >>> table insert results to be returned to the ORM/Application instead of >>> the master/base table insert >> >> Insert into the child table directly based on the partition rules. >> >> JD >> >> > I would think the ORM (as yet undefined) would want to think in terms > of the parent table and not know about the physical schema details. > Can the client not be written to check only for errors vs checking > for non-zero inserts? > > > That was our first suggestion, they don;t want to make any app changes
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: