Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56F19211.2020804@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 03/22/2016 11:33 AM, Thom Brown wrote: >> BDR or PgLogical or Native Partitioning or Federation/Sharding. > > The partitioning work is nice, but isn't that really just a way of > making partitioning easier? No, we don't at least not completely. Two simple, required problems we don't solve: Primary Keys Foreign Keys > We already have partitioning. We never > had parallelism. But we should of, it is an architectural limitation we are fixing one that is largely transparent and invisible to every user. Partitioning is a user/dba space thing that people will see and will actively use. > > It could be argued we also have sharding with foreign table inheritance. > > So really, it's BDR that's being argued as the reason for the big > jump, but then, what percentage of users will that be a big thing for? # of users is irrelevant (There are far more people NOT using JSON than there are that do. Guess what people talk about?) # of people talking about it is. Sincerely, jD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: