Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56F0B3EF.5040100@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki? (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On 03/21/2016 06:57 PM, Justin Clift wrote: > When looking through the wiki, there are various mentions > of pgFoundry around. They're not really pointing out that > it's extremely legacy/unwanted ;>, and to not put new projects > on there. > > Should we remove the references to it, or make them explicity > say something like "Do Not Use pgFoundry for new projects", or > <other suggestions welcome>? :) As far as I know, any active project has moved from pgFoundry. The best solution is to find where the new home is and update the links. It is correct that .Org does not endorse PgFoundry due to reliability issues. > > + Justin > > -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: