Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56EF2A75.3000407@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/17/16 9:01 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > I think that > there are an awful lot of cases where extension authors haven't been > able to quite do what they want to do without core changes because > they couldn't get control in quite the right place; or they could do > it but they had to cut-and-paste a lot of code. FWIW, I've certainly run into this at least once, maybe twice. The case I can think of offhand is doing function resolution with variant. I don't remember the details anymore, but my recollection is that to get what I needed I would have needed to copy huge swaths of the rewrite code. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: