Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Steele
Тема Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
Дата
Msg-id 56E9ED0F.2070303@pgmasters.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 3/10/16 1:24 PM, Corey Huinker wrote:

>     New patch for Alvaro's consideration.
>
>     Very minor changes since the last time, the explanations below are
>     literally longer than the changes:
>     - Rebased, though I don't think any of the files had changed in the
>     mean time
>     - Removed infinity checks/errors and the test cases to match
>     - Amended documentation to add 'days' after 'step' as suggested
>     - Did not add a period as suggested, to remain consistent with other
>     descriptions in the same sgml table
>     - Altered test case and documentation of 7 day step example so that
>     the generated dates do not land evenly on the end date. A reader
>     might incorrectly infer that the end date must be in the result set,
>     when it doesn't have to be.
>     - Removed unnecessary indentation that existed purely due to
>     following of other generate_series implementations

As far as I can see overall support is in favor of this patch although 
it is not overwhelming by any means.

I think in this case it comes down to a committer's judgement so I have 
marked this "ready for committer" and passed the buck on to Álvaro.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Integer overflow in timestamp[tz]_part() and date/time boundaries check
Следующее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Speedup twophase transactions