Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types

On 03/16/2016 09:38 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2016-03-16 16:50 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com
> <mailto:pavel.stehule@gmail.com>>:
>     2016-03-16 16:46 GMT+01:00 Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com
>     <mailto:mail@joeconway.com>>:
>
>         On 03/15/2016 05:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>         > In short, I think we should reject this implementation and instead try
>         > to implement the type operators we want in the core grammar's Typename
>         > production, from which plpgsql will pick it up automatically.  That is
>         > going to require some other syntax than this.  As I said, I'm not
>         > particularly pushing the function-like syntax I wrote upthread; but
>         > I want to see something that is capable of supporting all those features
>         > and can be extended later if we think of other type operators we want.
>
>         +1
>
>         Anyone want to argue against changing the status of this to
>         Rejected or
>         at least Returned with feedback?
>
>
>     I would to reduce this patch to fix row type issue. There is not any
>     disagreement. I'll send reduced patch today.
>
>     Any other functionality is not 9.6 topic.
>
> I played with the reduced patch, and the benefit without all other
> things is negligible. It should be rejected.

Ok, thanks -- done.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development