Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56E97B96.6020400@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/6/16 1:17 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2016-03-05 21:49 GMT+01:00 Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com > <mailto:mail@joeconway.com>>: > > I still don't see any point in trying to pass data back from the hooks > as the extension can maintain that state just fine, although it looks > like it would be pretty trivial to do using a new void* member added to > role_auth_extra. Tom (or anyone else), any comment on that? > > see Tom's comment, I share his opinion. > > I do however find myself wishing I could pass the action down from > set_config_option() to at least the assign_role() hook, but that seems > more invasive than I'd like. > > describe this use case, please. Joe, it looks there are some unresolved questions from Pavel and Craig on this thread and probably a new patch is required. Any idea when you can get to that? Thanks, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: