Re: Minor bug affecting ON CONFLICT lock wait log messages
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Minor bug affecting ON CONFLICT lock wait log messages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56E8182F.8020504@dalibo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Minor bug affecting ON CONFLICT lock wait log messages (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 15/03/2016 14:18, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Julien Rouhaud (julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com) wrote: >> On 15/03/2016 03:30, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: >>>> Attached patch fixes a bug reported privately by Stephen this morning. >>> >>> Bump. >>> >>> I would like to see this in the next point release. It shouldn't be >>> hard to review. >>> >> >> + reason_wait = indexInfo->ii_ExclusionOps ? >> + XLTW_RecheckExclusionConstr : XLTW_InsertIndex; >> >> Shouldn't it be set to XLTW_InsertIndexUnique instead? > > Actually, no, though I had the same question for Peter when I was first > reviewing this. > > XLTW_InsertIndexUnique is used when building a unique index, but this is > just a check, and more to the point, it's actually a re-check of what > we're doing in nbinsert.c where we're already using XLTW_InsertIndex. > > We wouldn't want to end up returning different error messages for the > same command under the same conditions just based, which is what we'd > potentially end up doing if we used XLTW_InsertIndexUnique here. > Oh I see. Thanks for the explanation! >> Otherwise the patch seems ok to me. > > Agreed. I'm going to play with it a bit more but barring objections, > I'll commit and back-patch Peter's patch. > > Thanks! > > Stephen > -- Julien Rouhaud http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: