Re: [HACKERS] How can we expand PostgreSQL ecosystem?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] How can we expand PostgreSQL ecosystem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56DF0673.2030608@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] How can we expand PostgreSQL ecosystem? ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] How can we expand PostgreSQL
ecosystem?
Re: [HACKERS] How can we expand PostgreSQL ecosystem? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 03/07/2016 10:24 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: >> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Klaver >>>> * MySQL touts more than 2,000 ISV/OEM/VARs. >>>> http://www.mysql.com/oem/ >> >> Though if you go to the actual list: >> http://www.mysql.com/customers/embedded/ >> >> There is at a rough count, 300. >> >> This points to the central dilemma, some of which is addressed below, >> separating fact from fiction. > > It seems the "Embedded" category shows products which use MySQL internally. Other products/vendors, such as JasperSoftand Talend which "can be used with" MySQL, are probably list elsewhere. e.g. Talend lists MySQL in their ecosystempage: > > https://jp.talend.com/ecosystem/company/mysql > > The 2,000 ISV/OEM/VARs Oracle touts should be found in the "MySQL specialization" section of Oracle Partner Network (OPN)site, though I couldn't access. I wonder if and where I can get the partner/product listing for Oracle Database. That'swhat I want. Do you really want to track down every single use site/application that uses MySQL? Would it not be better to work from the other end, ask people what applications they want to use with Postgres and then compile a list of those are supported or not? Basically the first part of your previous post. > > Regards > Takayuki Tsunakawa > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: