Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56DA3603.9060405@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/04/2016 04:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > As far as I understand it, > Bruce came in near the end of that conversation and now wants to claim > credit for something that doesn't really exist yet and, to the extent > that it does exist, wasn't even his idea. Robert, This does not sound like Bruce at all. Bruce is a lot of things, stubborn, sometimes temperamental, a lot of times like you... a hot head but he does not take credit for other people's work in my experience. > get reasonable plans, something that currently isn't true. I haven't > heard anybody objecting to that, and I don't expect to hear anybody > objecting to that, because it's hard to imagine why you wouldn't want > queries against foreign data wrappers to produce better plans than > they do today. At worst, you might think it doesn't matter either > way, but actually, I think there are a substantial number of people > who are pretty happy about join pushdown and I expect that when and if > we get aggregate pushdown working there will be even more people who > are happy about that. Agreed. > That's exactly what the people at EnterpriseDB who are actually doing > work in this area are attempting to do. Meanwhile, there's also > Bruce, who is neither doing nor planning to do any work in this area, > nor advising either EnterpriseDB or the PostgreSQL community to > undertake any particular project, but who *is* making it sound like > there is a super sekret plan that nobody else gets to see. However, I don't see this Robert. I don't see some secret hidden plan. I don't see any cabal. I see a guy that has an idea, just like everyone else on this list. > as the guy who actually wrote the plan that EnterpriseDB is following, > I happen to know that there's nothing more to it than what I wrote > above. Even if there was, so what? IF EDB wants to have a secret plan to push a lot of cool features to .Org, who cares? In the end, it all has to go through peer review and the meritocracy anyway. Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: