On 03/03/2016 09:34 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-03-03 18:31:03 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I think we want it at protocol level rather than pg_basebackup level.
>
> I think we may want both eventually, but I do agree that protocol level
> has a lot higher "priority" than that. Something like protocol level
> compression has a bit of different tradeofs than compressing base
> backups, and it's nice not to compress, uncompress, compress again.
Agreed. This is something that we have neglected and argued against for
no good reason for over a decade. It is time to get it done.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.