Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56D87AD9.5080606@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/03/2016 09:34 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-03-03 18:31:03 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I think we want it at protocol level rather than pg_basebackup level. > > I think we may want both eventually, but I do agree that protocol level > has a lot higher "priority" than that. Something like protocol level > compression has a bit of different tradeofs than compressing base > backups, and it's nice not to compress, uncompress, compress again. Agreed. This is something that we have neglected and argued against for no good reason for over a decade. It is time to get it done. Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: