Re: PROPOSAL: Fast temporary tables
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PROPOSAL: Fast temporary tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56D5EAC6.5010001@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PROPOSAL: Fast temporary tables (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PROPOSAL: Fast temporary tables
Re: PROPOSAL: Fast temporary tables |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/1/16 10:05 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > Fair point, that means inventing a whole new OID generation structure.. Generation is just the tip of the iceberg. You still need the equivalent to foreign keys (ie: pg_depend). While you would never have a permanent object depend on a temp object, the reverse certainly needs to be supported. If I were attempting to solve this at a SQL level, I'd be thinking about using table inheritance such that the permanent objects are stored in a permanent parent. New backends would create UNLOGGED children off of that parent. There would be a pid column that was always NULL in the parent, but populated in children. That means children could use their own local form of an OID. When a backend terminates you'd just truncate all it's tables. Actually translating that into relcache and everything else would be a serious amount of work. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: