Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56D5DD21.3040604@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/03/16 18:18, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: > > On 01.03.2016 19:03, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:19:45AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >>>>> Two reasons: >>>>> 1. There is no ideal implementation of DTM which will fit all >>>>> possible needs >>>>> and be efficient for all clusters. >>>> Hmm, what is the reasoning behind that statement? I mean, it is >>>> certainly true that there are some places where we have decided that >>>> one-size-fits-all is not the right approach. Indexing, for example. >>> Uh, is that even true of indexing? While the plug-in nature of indexing >>> allows for easier development and testing, does anyone create plug-in >>> indexing that isn't shipped by us? I thought WAL support was something >>> that prevented external indexing solutions from working. >> True. There is an API, though, and having pluggable WAL support seems >> desirable too. At the same time, I don't think we know of anyone >> maintaining a non-core index AM ... and there are probably good >> reasons for that. We end up revising the index AM API pretty >> regularly every time somebody wants to do something new, so it's not >> really a stable API that extensions can just tap into. I suspect that >> a transaction manager API would end up similarly situated. >> > > IMHO non-stable API is better than lack of API. > Just because it makes it possible to implement features in modular way. > And refactoring of API is not so difficult thing... > Since this thread heavily discusses the XTM, I have question about the XTM as proposed because one thing is very unclear to me - what happens when user changes the XTM plugin on the server? I didn't see any xid handover API which makes me wonder if changes of a plugin (or for example failure to load previously used plugin due to admin error) will send server to similar situation as xid wraparound. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: