Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
От | Teodor Sigaev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56D5B09C.5010405@sigaev.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I do not think the patch will make a lot of performance difference as-is; > its value is more in what it will let us do later. There are a couple of Yep, for now on my notebook (best from 5 tries): % pgbench -i -s 3000 % pgbench -s 3000 -c 4 -j 4 -P 1 -T 60 HEAD 569 tps patched 542 tps % pgbench -s 3000 -c 4 -j 4 -P 1 -T 60 -S HEAD 9500 tps patched 9458 tps Looks close to measurement error, but may be explained increased amount of work for planning. Including, may be, more complicated path tree. > this kind of optimization to chance. But the patch is big enough already, > so that (and a lot of other things) are getting left for later. Agree -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: