Re: PostgreSQL Auditing
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Auditing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56B12AC6.4060709@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Auditing (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Auditing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/2/16 4:50 PM, Michael Banck wrote: > > We are looking into packaging pgaudit for Debian. > > However, then another question comes up: Should the 2nd Quadrant or the > Crunchy Data codebase be added to the distribution? Who gets to decide? For my 2 cents I think that the version I submitted recently is better for PostgreSQL >= 9.5: https://github.com/pgaudit/pgaudit For this version I started with 2ndQuadrant's excellent work then spent months refactoring, testing and adding additional configuration options.In addition a number of reviewers found issues whichwere fixed and in general it went through a trial by fire. This version includes more comprehensive documentation and extensive regression tests. However, the original 2ndQuadrant version will happily work with PostgreSQL 9.3 or 9.4: https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/pgaudit > Alternatively, both could be added, but that will likely confuse users. This sort of confusion is one of the main reasons I pursued inclusion in core. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: