Re: PostgreSQL Auditing

On 2/2/16 10:34 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Auditing is a pretty security/enterprisey-related thing that could do
>> with the "officially considered to of the PostgreSQL project standard
>> and ready for production" rubber-stamp that tends to go along with most
>> end-user/admin-oriented stuff shipped in the tarball.
>
> Which is exactly why I think .Org needs an official "Extensions" project
> which would completely eliminate these arguments. A project team
> explicitly for vetting extensions.

Yeah, it's disappointing that PGXN doesn't seem to have really taken 
off. I'm sure a big part of that is the need for even SQL extensions to 
have server access, but I suspect part of it is because it's a separate 
project.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com