Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language
От | Igal @ Lucee.org |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56A909BF.1050001@lucee.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Implementing a new Scripting Language ("Igal @ Lucee.org" <igal@lucee.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/27/2016 9:58 AM, jflack wrote: > I just did a quick search on Lucee and what I found suggests that > it compiles to JVM bytecode and runs on a JVM. If that is the > case, and it can compile methods that will have the sort of > method signatures PL/Java expects, and you can put the .class > files in a jar and load it, your job should be just about done. :) yes, Lucee uses ASM4 to construct class files which are mostly POJOs > Or, you might end up writing thin wrappers in Java, probably > nothing more. > > Another possibility: Java has pluggable script engine support > (java specification request 233, see the javax.script package). > Does Lucee have an existing JSR 233 engine implementation? the next version of Lucee (currently in Beta) does support JSR-223, which I actually mentioned as a viable solution in my first email in this thread. That would be awesome if PL/Java would support JSR-223. thanks, Igal
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: