Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions

On 01/16/2016 06:07 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>> First installment -- pg_config function/view as a separate patch,
>> rebased to current master.
>
> Documentation would be good to have.

I'm definitely happy to write the docs, but earlier it was not clear
that there was enough support for this patch at all, and I don't want to
waste cycles writing docs for a feature that ultimately does not get
committed. What's the current feel for whether this feature in general
is a good idea or bad?

> ! # don't include subdirectory-path-dependent -I and -L switches
> ! STD_CPPFLAGS := $(filter-out -I$(top_srcdir)/src/include
> -I$(top_builddir)/src/include,$(CPPFLAGS))
> ! STD_LDFLAGS := $(filter-out -L$(top_builddir)/src/port,$(LDFLAGS))
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_CONFIGURE="\"$(configure_args)\""
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_CC="\"$(CC)\""
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_CPPFLAGS="\"$(STD_CPPFLAGS)\""
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_CFLAGS="\"$(CFLAGS)\""
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_CFLAGS_SL="\"$(CFLAGS_SL)\""
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_LDFLAGS="\"$(STD_LDFLAGS)\""
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_LDFLAGS_EX="\"$(LDFLAGS_EX)\""
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_LDFLAGS_SL="\"$(LDFLAGS_SL)\""
> ! override CPPFLAGS += -DVAL_LIBS="\"$(LIBS)\""
> This duplication from src/bin/pg_config is a bad idea. Couldn't we do
> something in src/common instead that sets up values at compilation
> time in a routine (perhaps set of routines) available for both the
> frontend and backend?

Will take a look at it.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development