Re: 9.5 Release press coverage
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.5 Release press coverage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5696972E.3050100@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.5 Release press coverage (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.5 Release press coverage
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 01/13/2016 10:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>>>> If EnterpriseDB is making false statements, then it is >>>>> entirely right for people to be upset about that, but our press >>>>> release does not do that. I have read that press release several >> > > To be honest, I'm not sure the disparity in name recognition is > anywhere near as large as you seem to be portraying here. I think > most people who care about PostgreSQL to any degree know that there > are many PostgreSQL companies and who some of the leading ones are. > It is possible that a press release from EnterpriseDB might cause > somebody who doesn't yet know anything about PostgreSQL to learn about > EnterpriseDB before they learn about other companies, but if that > press release is written in an inappropriately self-aggrandizing > fashion, once they do start to learn how it works, that's actually > going to work against EDB, not for it. Tomas said more or less the > same thing upthread and I think he's right: grandstanding is not a > benefit to EnterpriseDB, or really anyone, anywhere, ever. So I > *don't* think that our press release is inappropriately claiming > credit for anybody else's work, but if it is, then I think that's > first of all wrong but also secondly bad marketing that will come back > to bite us. > As the person who opened this can of worms by making mention of the article in question, I have the following to say. Enough already! Almost immediately after my post Dave Page posted saying a correction was on the way, which indeed happened. The post to --announce was admitted to as a joint error by all concerned. Mea Culpa's have been issued copiously. I would say all concerned have gotten the message that mistakes happen, next time we try better. Parsing intent especially at a distance and via electronic media is an exercise in futility. Personally I think the needs of the community are best served by moving on. Lets just get people using Postgres. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: