Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 568DF815.7060906@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/01/06 13:07, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Amit Langote >> >> Patch 4_database_catalog_tenancy_v5 fails to apply: > > May be you missed to apply the 3_shared_catalog_tenancy_v4 path, > because 4_database_catalog_tenancy_v5 patch depends on it. Oops, I even missed patches 1 and 2 at all. > > Here I attached all the patches for your convenience, I am able to > apply all patches in the order without any problem. Okay, thanks! I applied all the patches. I have a basic question. Sorry though if I've entirely missed the point (and/or scope) of your proposal. I wonder if something like the following should not have failed with the patch: postgres=# CREATE POLICY class_policy ON pg_class TO PUBLIC USING (relowner = current_user); ERROR: permission denied: "pg_class" is a system catalog Is there no support yet for user-defined catalog policies? Regards, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: