Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel

On 12/21/2015 07:41 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

...

>> So both patches seem to do the trick, but (2) is faster. Not sure
>> if this is expected. (BTW all the results are without asserts
>> enabled).
>
> Do you know what the size of the pending list was at the end of each
> test?
>
> I think last one may be faster because it left a large mess behind
> that someone needs to clean up later.

No. How do I measure it?

>
> Also, do you have the final size of the indexes in each case?

No, I haven't realized the patches do affect that, so I haven't measured it.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services