Re: Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630 surprisingly reliable)
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630 surprisingly reliable) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56773A6C.1010703@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630 surprisingly reliable) (Félix GERZAGUET <felix.gerzaguet@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630
surprisingly reliable)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/20/15 1:09 PM, Félix GERZAGUET wrote: > After reading > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/wal-reliability.html, I > tried the recommended diskchecker.pl > <http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html> but I am not satisfied: > > I always get: > Total errors: 0 > > even if I tested with with a HGST HTS721010A9E630 that the vendor's > datasheet > (http://www.hgst.com/sites/default/files/resources/TS7K1000_ds.pdf) > advertise as " > Designed for low duty cycle, non mission-critical applications in > PC,nearline and consumer electronics environments, which vary > application to application > " > > Since it is not, a high end disk, I expect some errors. Why? Just because a disk isn't enterprise-grade doesn't mean it has to lie about fsync, which is the only thing diskchecker.pl tests for. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: