Re: a word-choice question
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a word-choice question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5664773D.8080702@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: a word-choice question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/06/2015 11:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes: >> In PL/Java's function annotations, 'type' has been used for the >> volatility category: >> @Function(type=IMMUTABLE) >> public static String hello() { return "Hello, world!"; } >> It seems a bit infelicitous because you would probably sooner guess that >> 'type' was telling you something about the function's _data_ type > Yeah ... > >> But I've been trying think of something short, clear, preferably >> monosyllabic, less geeky than 'v8y', and I don't have a winner yet. > Instead of thinking about "volatility", maybe something based on > "stability" or "constancy"? I suppose "const" is too much of a conflict, > but "stable=IMMUTABLE" doesn't seem awful. > > I would stick with "volatility". It makes for consistency - pg_proc has "provolatile" for example. I think it's a moderately well understood term in the Postgres world. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: