Re: Datatypes and performance
От | Maksim Likharev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Datatypes and performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56510AAEF435D240958D1CE8C6B1770A014A0D84@mailc03.aurigin.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Datatypes and performance ("Jay O'Connor" <joconnor@cybermesa.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Datatypes and performance
|
Список | pgsql-general |
How postgres internally stores text fields, in a separate table? -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:andrew@libertyrms.info] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 12:55 PM To: PostgreSQL List Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Datatypes and performance On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:10:41AM -0700, Jay O'Connor wrote: > Based on the docs, they say that there's not performance difference between > using varchar(n) and text. > > So will leaving my fields as unlimited varchar be a performance issue? Or > should I try to narrow them down? In fact, there is a performance penalty for limiting their length, because you have to check on each insert. > My coworker has more experience with Oracle and MS-SQL than postgresql You may want to tell your coworker to read the docs ;-) A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: