Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 564CEFE7.30702@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data. (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing
dead tuples with sensitive data.
Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data. Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data. Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data. |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/18/2015 01:34 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:22:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> It's quite unclear to me what threat model such a behavior would add >> useful protection against. > > If you had some sort of high-security database and deleted some data > from it, it's important for the threat modeller to know whether the > data is gone-as-in-overwritten or gone-as-in-marked-free. This is the > same reason they want to know whether a deleted file is actually just > unlinked on the disk. > > This doesn't mean one thing is better than another; just that, if > you're trying to understand what data could possibly be exfiltrated, > you need to know the state of all of it. > > For realistic cases, I expect that deleted data is usually more > important than updated data. But a threat modeller needs to > understand all these variables anyway. Alright, I was following you up to this. Seems to me deleted data would represent stale/old data and would be less valuable. > > A > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: