Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 564B4B0C.30508@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/17/15 4:41 AM, Thom Brown wrote: > Could someone post a TL;DR summary of what the current plan looks > like? I can see there is a huge amount of discussion to trawl back > through. I can see it's something to do with the visibility map. And > does it avoid freezing very large tables like the title originally > sought? Basically, it follows the same pattern that all-visible bits do, except instead of indicating a page is all-visible, the bit shows that all tuples on the page are frozen. That allows a scan_all vacuum to skip those pages. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: